Thirtieth
Ordinary Sunday Year C
Here’s another twist to the parable. A bishop, the rector of the parish
and the sacristan were praying fervently in church. All three supplicants were
protesting their unworthiness.
The bishop, in a subdued voice, was overheard repeating the
following mantra, “Lord, I am a great sinner… Lord, I am a great sinner!”
The rector, who was kneeling next to his bishop, did not want to be
outdone in his humble protestations, as he repeated “Lord, I am truly a sinner
… Lord, I am truly a sinner!”
Kneeling behind the two was the old sacristan of the Church, whose
prayer was filled with tears and sobs and with little else, who cried out: “Lord,
I have sin! Lord I have sin!”
Both bishop and the rector had to stop praying when it became
obvious that their efforts were being drowned out by the escalating sobs and
cries of the third man. The bishop turned to the rector with indignation and
complained, “Look at who’s trying to be a sinner!”
Pride often poses as humility. It strategises
to be honoured while looking all humble. It’s sometimes hard to tell the
difference because pride resides within the heart and not on the face. Our
outward appearances stripped down, no frills, flaunting bare simplicity (or
simplistic), a humble façade, can often veil our pride. Pride can pose
itself in a dumb down crowd pleasing form of religion or a Spartan white washed
minimalist form of liturgy. Pride is a seasoned player at disguising
itself as virtue. Pride began in the Garden, when Adam wanted to “be like
God”. Seen in this light, we now recognise the true face of pride – it is
narcissism – the worship of self, the enthronement of man over God.
Humility, on the other hand, comes from the Latin
word humus, which means “ground” or
“soil”. It reminds us of the second creation account (see Gen 2:7) in which God
forms the first human beings from the dust of the ground and breathes life into
them. It is an admission of our own vileness in comparison to the infinite
greatness of God. Thus bowing, prostrating, and genuflecting, gestures that
physically moves the body closer to the ‘ground’, gestures that suggest submission, respect, humility, reverence and obedience, comes naturally to the humble supplicant. Humility
considers Christ and His glory. It does not feel the need to hide the
glory of God. St Paul in the second reading speaks
of all the blessings that he has received from God and gives Him glory. False
humility, on the other hand, conceals the glory of God, and in doing so pushes
oneself to the fore.
The parable of the Pharisee and tax collector in
today’s gospel stands out in bold relief and presents two paradigms of prayer or
worship. Here we see by sharp contrast the utter worthlessness of
self-righteousness, self-exaltation, and self-praise in praying. The Pharisee
seemed to be rigorously schooled in prayer, by training and by habit, but he prays
not. Words are uttered by him, but words are not prayer. Pride,
self-righteousness, and narcissism have entirely poisoned his supplications.
His entire praying has been impregnated with self-praise, self-congratulation,
and self-exaltation. God is not glorified; man, however, is elevated.
On the other hand, the tax collector, smitten
with a deep sense of his sins and his inward sinfulness, realising how poor in
spirit he is, how utterly devoid of anything like righteousness, goodness, or
any quality which would commend him to God, falls down with humiliation and
despair before God, while he utters a sharp cry for mercy for his sins and his
guilt. A sense of sin and a realisation of utter unworthiness have fixed the
roots of humility deep down in his soul. The tax collector stood at a distance and would not even look up toward heaven. His
posture reflected his deep reverence for the transcendence of God. This is the picture of humility against pride
in praying.
The tax collector thus provides us a not just a
model of humility or contrition, but presents to us the condition sine qua non of worship. Celebrating good
liturgy requires a good dose of humility. Liturgy, in fact, best articulates
the real meaning of humility – the glorification of God rather than of man.
Blessed John Paul II reminds us that “the celebration of the Liturgy … must be
characterised by a profound sense of the sacred. Both the individual and the
community must be aware that, in a special way, through the Liturgy they come
into the presence of Him who is thrice holy and transcendent. Consequently, the
disposition required of them is one that can only flow from that reverence and
awe deriving from an awareness of being in the presence of the majesty of
Almighty God.” It is unfortunate that many see such emphasis of reverence and
transcendence as a barrier to popular worship.
Many a Catholic resent what they call “pomp and pomposity” in the
celebration of the Eucharist. It appears to them as though this is contrary to
the spirit of poverty which Christ displayed throughout His life, from His
birth in a stable to His death on the Cross outside of the city of Jerusalem.
This simplistic analysis, completely overlooks a crucial event in His life however,
which is directly connected to the Eucharist, namely the anointing at Bethany.
Christ had no problem, and even delighted in the “pomp and pomposity” with
which Mary, the sister of Lazarus, poured a costly ointment on His sacred feet.
It was Judas who protested. That’s ‘humility’ for you!
Ever since the election of Pope Francis, there
has been heightened discussions on how Pope Francis personifies the ideal of a
simplified, humbled, version of liturgy free of ostentatious trappings of his
predecessor. Certainly, there seems to be a preference for less elaborately
ornate liturgical vestments. But this does not make Pope Francis the poster boy
for what passes as ‘humble’ liturgy. In fact, there is nothing humble about
liturgy that is shorn of beauty, mystery, awe, and grandeur which is ultimately
due to God, and never for man. This is certainly far from the intention of Pope
Francis himself. One can easily discern his solemn disposition during every
celebration of the Mass – his outer and inner vision is directed only to God. The
problem is that many wrongly read into this an overt effort to remove the
symbols of power and office and to put in place poverty and humility. The detractors of
liturgical finery just don’t get it – that there is no conflict or
contradiction between humble and sublime liturgies. Great humility and great
beauty are not mutually exclusive.
He who rejects beauty in the mass forgets that
the liturgy, as pointed out by St John Chrysostom, the Great Doctor of the East
who was also a lover of the poor, is a foretaste of ‘heaven on earth.’
Therefore, one who thinks he is stripping the liturgy of unnecessary
accoutrements that would hinder accessibility of the poor to the liturgy,
actually ends up denying them the beauty and treasures of heaven. Denying the
beauty of the mass to the masses is sort of like denying food to the hungry. The
poor normally have no access to the grandeur or opulence of the king’s palace,
but within the liturgy, they are transported into the most magnificent palace
of the King of Kings. To deny them this right would be patronising and
condescending, and in fact discriminates against the poor – it is saying that
the poor are unworthy of beauty, unworthy of beatitude. There is nothing humble
about this. In fact, it reeks of hubris. Humility is about forgetting self, not
forgetting beauty which serves to honour God and give him glory.
Have you noticed how we have regressed to performing mere
perfunctory head bows (often with great reluctance) from the days when we used
to genuflect whenever we came before the presence of Christ in the Eucharist? This
seems to suggest an so absorbed in our own self-importance that we bow to no
one, not even to God. Abba Appolo, a desert father of the Church reminds us
that "the devil has no knees; he
cannot kneel; he cannot adore; he cannot pray; he can only look down his nose
in contempt. Being unwilling to bend the knee at the name of Jesus is the
essence of evil." Our thrust for democratisation now threatens to
reduce God to the level of humanity – He’s just one of the guys who does not
deserve our bowing and genuflections. But when a good man, a humble man, a man
who recognises his own unworthiness, is in the presence of greatness, he knows how
to abase himself whether it be in posture or expression. The humble man
does not presume familiarity in the presence of greatness for that would
certainly be contemptuous.
Today, instead of abasing ourselves humbly
before our awesome and mysterious God during the reenactment of the Sacrifice
of Calvary at every Holy Mass, we delude ourselves into thinking we are being
humble when we strip the liturgy of its majesty and beauty, when we abolish our
kneeling and profound bows, and substitute our sacred hymns that sing of the
majesty of God for folksy ditties that speak about ourselves. True humility, can
never be subjecting God to the humiliation we are simply witnessing in the
impoverished and lackadaisical celebrations of our liturgy. True humility, as
the parable and St Paul teach us, leads to exaltation - not of ourselves but of
the God who created us, saves us, and loves us. Pope Benedict has reminded us
that it is in the liturgy that the renewal and reform of the Church begins. And
it is here that we must begin our lesson in true humility.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.
Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.