Fourth
Ordinary Sunday Year C
If Jesus had lived today, he could have saved
himself from a lot of bad press by listening to some useful advice from pundits
of political correctness – the art of not offending the sensitivities of his
audience. But I guess, if this was true, Jesus would have equally stayed on course
and perhaps gotten himself into the same kind of trouble, if not worse. Last
week, we saw Jesus begin his public ministry by preaching in the synagogue of
Nazareth. He stacked up brownie points for his gracious and inspiring words,
words that promised healing and liberation. Things
rapidly and dramatically changed when
he began to challenge their ideas and convictions. Jesus
reminded them that God’s salvation is accorded to Gentiles too, not just Jews.
They were not so elite, not so chosen, and not so exclusively special. Their
prideful expectations were subjected to a humiliating reality check and this
enraged them, so much so that they wanted to throw Him headlong over a cliff. No
sweet comforting words here, just the plain painful Truth.
This reaction is to be expected. Isn’t it quite natural that when we hear words pleasing to us, we
accept them, but when they disturb our consciences we might well dismiss them
as worthless. There are people who choose a church where they can experience good
feelings from warm and fuzzy words, nothing disturbing nor demanding should
pass the lips of the pastor. Today, we are reminded that it is true that the
gospel of Jesus Christ is a great word of consolation and refreshment, but it
can also be harsh and demanding, as Jesus himself could be harsh and demanding.
Our “precious” Saviour is also the unpopular Prophet who confronts sin and challenges
our preconceived notions of salvation and prejudices.
Many, including leaders in the Church, are subjected to the temptation
of preaching the gospel shaped by political correctness. We shy away from
making difficult gospel-based demands of the people while choosing to tamper
not just their words but inevitably the values that underlie those words. Political
correctness always seeks to preserve a good image whilst attempting not to
offend anyone. And it is never too difficult to offend someone in today’s age.
When we speak of Jesus as the Son of God, we risk offending the Muslims; when
we quote from St Paul we risk being labeled a misogynist (woman-hater); when we
refer to ourselves as the People of God we risk being accused of being
religious bigots; when we rail against abortion, we risk being judged as being
unsympathetic to the plight of the women; and when we speak of the institutions
of marriage and family, we risk excluding those who practice alternative
lifestyles. The end of this ideology is that there are no absolutes, no
absolute moral norms, no absolute Truths. In fact, political correctness seems
to be the antithesis of truth. Political correctness seeks never to offend,
while Truth always carries with it the potential for offense. But the truth is
that Jesus did offend many people. He offended his hometown, he offended his
family, he offended the leaders, he offended the crowds, he offended his own
disciples. Too often we are so preoccupied with trying to avoid offending
anyone, we end up offending God. Jesus once taught, “Blessed is he who does not
take offense in me” (Luke 7:23). Looks like the pundits of political
correctness had forgotten this last bit in trying to please the whole world,
all and sundry, except the only one who matters.
Proponents of political correctness would often argue that Truth is
divisive, in that divides the community. They feel that many well intentioned
Catholics, though divorced and remarried, living in irregular unions, dissenters
of Church teachings, should not be made to feel as if they are excluded and
isolated. Truth is perceived as intolerant and a serious barrier to community
cohesion and inclusiveness. They are convinced that love includes and should never
exclude. But if the Church is to make room for everyone, it may mean having no
room for the Truth. By definition, truth does separate – it separates the truth
from falsehood. It divides those who want to know the truth from those who do
not want to know. Thus, Jesus sitting in judgment divides the goats from the
sheep. Truth is indeed intolerant but its intolerance is directed to lies and
sin which seeks to hide behind the cover of euphemisms. In fact, Truth in
itself is not divisive. It does not spell the absence of love. It is people who
become divisive when they are unwilling to accept the truth.
Many would lament that
the Church is losing many of its members because they feel that her demands are
too rigorous and her teachings too hard. This is a common argument cited in
favour of greater accommodation – making Christianity softer and its message more
palatable for a wider consumption. The myth is that people will stay with the
Church if she makes it easier for them to do so, which means amending not just
Church laws but even gospel values and teachings so that the Church can be seen
to be more inclusive. But statistics of membership patterns among liberal
Protestant denominations show otherwise. Some Protestant denominations like the
Anglicans have been making accommodations over the years, but they have not
been able to stem the trend of decline. In fact, these politically correct
churches have been accused by their own members of being so busy in accommodating
other people’s views they have forgotten to put forward their own claim, which
is the gospel of Jesus Christ. In their obsession to be politically correct, they
have forgotten what it means to be Christ-correct. When we sacrifice truth at
the altar of popularity, we risk not only losing our edge and identity, but
also damning ourselves and others to perdition.
Today, political correctness has become a substitute
for God in unbelievers and a poor substitute of the gospel to those who truly
require liberation from a culture of half-truths, manipulated information and
outright lies. What is more worrisome is that there is an inherently religious
aspect to political correctness. It reduces everything to human accomplishment
whilst downplaying and even disregarding the sacred. In other words, political
correctness substitutes man for God. Many, if not most of the problems in this
world today are the results of people rejecting the true God and replacing Him
with a false god of good feelings that Political Correctness gives them. The
antidote for Political Correctness is the Real Thing, Jesus Christ. Christ is
not some esoteric good feeling we get from politically correct words; He will
actually fill the yearning we have for God.
There is an urgent need to recover our nerve as Christians. We do
not need to be obsessed with walking on egg-shells in attempting not to offend
others, especially when this means offending God and betraying the Truth which
he wishes to communicate to the world. Christians, who hold firm the gospel of
Christ, are bound to offend others. We don’t have to feel embarrassed about our
faith. We do not need to apologise for being Christians or for believing that
Jesus is the unique and universal Saviour of the World and that He is the Truth,
the Way and the Life. Although apologies are not needed, apologetics is most
necessary – we need to give a reasonable explanation for our faith; we need to
defend Jesus not just with reasonable arguments but also with our lives. We
must never mistake our witnessing of Christ for arrogance. It is a demand of
faith and love. It is time to step out of the shadow of political correctness
and speak the Truth with Love. The Pope reminds us that Love and Truth are not antithetical
but rather Love or charity is always in service of the Truth and that Truth
springs from the well-spring of Love. To separate the two would only spell
disaster – it could lead either to a politically correct gospel devoid of its
essential truth or its opposite, a harsh demeaning religion that does not know the
meaning of love nor compassion. We must, therefore, never forget that on the
Last Day, we will be judged by Christ, who is both the Saviour and Judge of the
world, guided by what is acceptable to God and not by the common vote of a jury
of peers dictated by what is acceptable to man.
Your last sentence particularly resonates with me. How much simpler decision making would be if we could hold on to this truth as our guiding principle. A thought provoking piece, Fr Michael.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete