Fourth Sunday of Lent Year C
Last month, I was down
in a neighbouring diocese giving the monthly recollection to the clergy on the
topic of interreligious dialogue. As it usually happens in all lively
discussions, we got waylaid and took an unexpected detour into the region of
liturgy. When it comes to interreligious dialogue, most clergy have practically
no issues. For the most part, this area lies outside our competence as well as
field of vision. But liturgy’s another matter all together – a potential
minefield. Someone once said that if you were to put three liturgists in a
room, they would most likely come up with five different liturgical interpretations.
The debate in this case centred on the issue of whether the bereaving family
members of the deceased could offer a eulogy at the end of the mass. Although
there is no clear restriction, I proposed that it was not liturgically correct as
the whole focus should be on the Eucharist, which is a re-enactment of God’s
work of salvation. No amount of adulations and good words (‘eulogy’) could
immortalise the deceased. It is God who saves. Thus the giving of a eulogy,
praising the deeds of men, would therefore trivialise the significance of the
Eucharist, which praises the works of God. In a way, eulogies are just another kind of narcissistic expression which seeks to take the limelight away from God. One priest strongly objected with
the following exclamation, “But people have rights!” I couldn’t help but
mischievously quip in reply, “How about God’s rights?” Another priest added,
“People also have a right not to listen (to the eulogy).”
We are a society which
has grown acutely sensitive of our rights and sense of entitlement. Older people feel entitled to certain benefits from the
government. Middle-aged people feel entitled to generous health and retirement
benefits from their employers. Younger adults feel entitled to immediately
enjoy the same standard of living their parents took years to achieve. And
young people feel entitled to whatever material luxuries they desire. It surely
seems appropriate in our culture where we believe we are now entitled to a
whole host of things in life. Some believe that they are entitled to
kick-backs and bribes, thus the rampant corruption that plagues our system. Others
believe that they are entitled to a responsibility-free existence, thus when
something goes wrong, someone else is to blame. And still others think they are
entitled to a sacrificially-free existence, so they object over having to give
up for the sake of another. Church going people are no different. Many
Catholics believe that they are entitled to a whole range of benefits just by
being members of the parish. Any
perceived curtailment of any of these rights or the denial of entitlements and
you may have a riot on your hands.
Both sons in today’s
famous parable had the impression that their father’s inheritance was a sort of
entitlement. The younger son's sense of entitlement is obvious: he demands his
inheritance so he can live as he pleases. He is claiming his birth ‘right’ –
his argument is based purely on the strength of lineage. But the older brother
displays a similar sense of entitlement in his condemnation and rejection of
his brother. He believes that his hard work and good behaviour had earned him
the right to the economic benefits and stability of his father's love. Both
felt that the father ‘owed’ it to them. Both were deeply flawed.
In the case of the
younger son, he equated personal freedom with his right to do whatever he
wished. He desired a life free from discipline, from the norms of God’s
commandments, from his father’s orders. He wanted to be his own man without any
reference to his father or even God. He
was concerned only with his own selfish interest, a heart which had no place
for the other, certainly none for his father. Also note
the attitude by which the older son lives his life by. His whole attitude is
about what he should get from what he has done and not about ‘Who am I becoming
in the process?’ He’s about ‘doing’ what a son does and forgot about ‘being’ who
a son ought to be. Simply put, the older son was about the Father’s house, but
completely missed the Father’s heart.
Competition, bitter
rivalry, envy and destructive conflict often arises from this entitlement
mentality, the mentality that believes the world or someone or something owes
it to us. People often fail to recognise that whenever the discussion of any
issue descends to the level of mere assertion of personal rights, we often find
ourselves trapped in a selfish self-serving delusional world blind to the needs
of others. It is literally saying that our needs are more important than those
of others. Few people understand that when someone asserts a right to
something, very often someone else’s right is infringed. For example, let’s say
that you and I are neighbours. You lead a group of rock
musicians who can practice only in the evenings; while I, on the other hand,
enjoy nothing more than quiet evenings. Presumably, you have a right to pursue
your musical career, and I have a right quietly to enjoy my property. The
problem is that your right is incompatible with mine. As
a priest in large parish with a multitude of parishioners with conflicting
interests, I often find myself caught in endless debates about entitlement. The
conversation often gets so wrapped up in the championing of rights and
entitlements that we quickly lose sight of grace.
This leads us back to
consider the beautiful parable of the Prodigal Son, and especially the
character of the father. The father expresses the gratuitousness of grace – it
is given to those who do not merit it nor earned it. It is wholly the gift of
the father; he does not ‘owe’ it to his sons. The
“Father” in this story is undoubtedly characteristic of our Heavenly Father who
forgives and restores us back to relationship with Him. Thus the gospel helps us understand who God truly
is. He is the Merciful Father who in Jesus loves us beyond all measure. To the
world, the father seems like a foolish foggy old man madden with love for his
two sons – one an ingrate wastrel and the other, a resentful and reluctant
worker. The errors committed by his sons do not corrode the fidelity of the old
man’s love for them. In this way, he provides for us the example of how to liberate
ourselves from the entitlement trap. We do so whenever we begin to consider the
needs of the other, apart from our own rights and entitlements. The father
invites us to move from a ‘give me’ mentality to that of personal
responsibility. While there's a time and place for discussing rights, what's
most helpful is the reminder that we need to extend grace to others, even to
those who don’t seem to deserve it.
Furthermore, this
parable helps us to understand who the human being is: he is not a an isolated
being who lives only for himself and must have life for himself alone. On the
contrary, we live with others, we were created together with others and only in
being with others, in giving ourselves to others, do we find life. This
revelation throws light on the real meaning of freedom. According to Pope
Emeritus Benedict XVI, “freedom... is a springboard from which to dive into the
infinite sea of divine goodness, but it can also become a tilted plane on which
to slide towards the abyss of sin and evil and thus also to lose freedom and
our dignity.” He said that in modern times we have seen
theories proposing that human beings should be, “free, autonomous, and nothing
else.” This supposed freedom from everything, including freedom from the duty
of obedience to God, is a lie because human being does not exist on its own,
nor does it exist for itself. If God is not the point of reference, then man
will descend to the level of hedonistic immorality or addictive servitude.
This coming week, we
will be celebrating the Parish Penitential Service. The Father invites us to
return home. Let us make this inner
pilgrimage freely and without reservation. Christ wishes to set us truly free
from the bondage of sin, of selfishness, of material illusions and addictions. We
come without pretences, acknowledging that we are undeserving, not entitled to
the graces we ask from him. We come with humility recognising that only when we
have returned to the Father, both inwardly and outwardly, can we experience
true freedom of the soul. Let us come to him to celebrate the feast prepared
for us, for the one who is lost is now found, the one who is dead is now alive
once more.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.
Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.