Third Ordinary Sunday Year C
There was a time when academic performance
was the conclusive benchmark of intelligence. You were either graded as
excellent, good, average, below average or just simply stupid (Ok, the last one
was my addition). Then experts in pedagogical sciences and gurus of motivation began
telling us that some of us who didn’t make the marks weren’t really stupid. Apart
from IQ, you also had the benefit of EQ. It was music to the ears to learn how
this had now leveled the playing field. These experts argued that it all came
down to learning styles. To learn, we depend on our senses to process the
information around us. Most people tend to use one of their senses more than
the others. Therefore, there are generally three types of learning styles based
on different modes of acquiring information: auditory (hearing), visual
(seeing) and kinaesthetic (using hands or action). Some educationist would also insist that the
learning capacity increases as we move from auditory methods to kinaesthetic,
thus the auditory style is regarded as the least effective. This is best
articulated in the Chinese saying, “I hear and I forget, I see and I remember,
I do and I understand.”
Today’s readings remind us that Christians,
following the tradition of the Jews and the Hebrews before them, are
intentionally auditory. But this does not mean that the Judeo-Christian culture
is inferior to others which emphasised ‘doing’. Israel was a nation of prophets, not philosophers. Prophets listen to
God. Philosophers envision. For the Greek philosopher, intellectual
understanding came through the eye. For the Hebrew prophet, it came through the
ear. The eye sees and dissects. The ear, on the other hand, hears and obeys. The
Hebrews began their scriptures by saying that God spoke and all came into
existence. The most fundamental statement of the Law (Dt 6:4), begins with the
words, “Hear” or “Listen”. The logic of
the Hebrew scriptures is the logic of revelation. God is the cause; we are the
result. The Lord speaks and his word has effect. In the logic of revelation,
the most illogical thing is to refuse to listen to the Voice of God. To refuse
to listen is to refuse to participate in what God is doing. The prophets called
it rebellion. Thus we call evil irrational.
It is interesting to
note that the etymology of the word ‘obedience’, which comes from the Latin ‘obedire’, or in the original Biblical
languages, Hebrew (shema) and Greek (hupakouo), means to listen. Perhaps,
this is one of the reasons why listening is so under-rated in today’s society
that places ‘doing’ or activism as the benchmark of achievement. In a “just do
it” culture, the whole notion of obedience seems absurd and even anachronistic.
Everything in our culture resists obedience, because we are made to feel that
any loss of control over self-fulfillment is a loss of self. Because of the
emphasis placed on freedom, self-will, autonomy and personal determination,
obedience does little to suggest a good life. From a marketing perspective,
obedience is a hard sell, especially because the very notion of obedience seems
to be a suffocation of life rather than the promotion of it.
Yet obedience is a
core element of the gospel, a primary dimension of Jesus’ life and relationship
with his Father, but also of what it means to a Christian. Jesus is the wholly
obedient one. "He humbled Himself becoming
obedient to death, even death on a cross" (Phil. 2:8) and "through
the obedience of the One, the many will be made righteous" (Rom. 5:19). Jesus not only listened and obeyed the word of
God, He totally identified with it - He is the Word. Thus at the end today’s
gospel, he could confidently announced that he is the fulfillment of the
prophetic word. For many centuries the Hebrews strained to listen to the Word
of God through their prophets, but then the Word came even closer. The Word
became flesh. Humanity was allowed to
see the Word, not as a written word, but a living Word.
Unfortunately, many
often reduce obedience to just a matter of following rules and conforming to
obligations. Today’s readings remind us that obedience is more about an
encounter with the Living Word, Jesus. It is more about effective listening
than blind obedience to dead letter of the law. It means getting in touch with
the voice and life of the Spirit. The three readings provide us with different
levels of listening.
In the first reading,
we read about the reconstruction of the moral and religious fibre of a
foundering nation that has lost not only its independence but also its
integrity. The foundation of this reconstruction would be the Law, which is the
name given by Jews to their scriptures. As they listened attentively to the
words of their holy book being read by Ezra the scribe, the crowd was moved not
only to tears but ultimately to worship. For them, the Law was not just a set
of religious and moral rules and obligations, it was the voice of God, the God
that had not abandoned them, the God who was now restoring their fortune. Thus
the first level of listening is listening to God, a listening which inspires
worship, a listening that inspires conversion, and a listening that demands
obedience and surrender to the sovereignty of God.
The second reading
proposes a second level of listening. In obedience we also listen to the voice
of the Church, the Body of Christ. In the face of the human heart’s tendency
towards narcissism, individualism and exclusiveness more than towards the needs
of the other, obedience as attentive listening to the other members of the Body
of Christ frees us to live for the other and become an integral part of the
family we call Church. Obedience can challenge our worldviews and prejudices
which often filters our perception of God’s will.
Finally, the gospel speaks
of the third level of listening – listening to the poor, the oppressed, and the
marginalised. By citing a text from Isaiah, Luke attempts to explain Jesus’
mission as a proclamation of gladness for the poor, liberty for the captives,
sight for the blind, release for prisoners and a year of favour for all. These
categories are often regarded by the larger society as invisible, thus not
deserving its attention or time. The rich and the powerful have our ears, but
not the poor. Thus, the cries of the poor are a great corrective to our
self-importance, selfishness and pride. If our heart’s desires are gifts from
God, then listening to the cries of the poor reveals the demands these gifts
make on us. Any Christian life which does not listen to the voice of the poor
effectively shuts out the voice of God.
Christ’s powerful
words spoken to us at Mass are meant to change things, to change us, to change
the hearts and the lives of all who hear them. In the past when the mass was
said in Latin, many people would resort to ‘reading’ the word from their
missals. But now that the Word of God is proclaimed in our own language, we
should put aside our missals, abandon the need to see the text projected on the
screen, because listening to the word requires more than just our attention, it
demands a total investment of ourselves, it demands obedience. Reading along
and listening attentively are very different activities and have very different
results. Most people would prefer reading. We are independent of the lector who
proclaims the Word. Reading allows us to set the pace and affords an
opportunity to analyse the text. In a certain way, we continue to assert
mastery over the word. But we are a people called to ‘listen.’ Listening makes
us uncomfortable because we strain to listen not just with our ears but also
with our hearts. Listening treats the word in a personal way, rather than just
a subject to be studied. Listening is relational. Thus, we listen to God, we do
not read or study him. In listening, we make no demands of the Word – we merely
listen, embrace the Word and obey. We seek not to substitute the Word with our
words. But rather we allow the Word to form, challenge, comfort and finally
consume us.