In the second Christian century, Saint Justin
the Martyr, wrote several steering apologetical sermons in defence of
Christians and their practices. In the first of such apologia, he wrote on the
Christian’s belief in the Eucharist, “We do not consume the eucharistic bread
and wine as if it were ordinary food and drink, for we have been taught that as
Jesus Christ our Saviour became a man of flesh and blood by the power of the
Word of God, so also the food that our flesh and blood assimilates for its
nourishment becomes the flesh and blood of the incarnate Jesus by the power of
his own words contained in the prayer of thanksgiving. No one may share the
Eucharist with us unless he believes that what we teach is true, unless he is
washed in the regenerating waters of baptism for the remission of his sins, and
unless he lives in accordance with the principles given us by Christ.”
The basic principle outlined in the second part
of this quotation is this: Only Catholics may receive holy Communion, and
Catholics who do receive holy Communion must be properly disposed. The reason
for this should be obvious to those who truly appreciate the significance of
the Eucharist. In Communion, we receive the very body
and blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ. Not only is it an intimate
encounter with Christ, but Holy Communion deepens unity with the Church, more
fully assimilating us into Christ. Therefore Holy Communion is not something to be taken lightly. It should always be
considered a great and holy privilege, and we must ensure that we are properly
disposed.
Such a strict regiment was not the invention of
the early theologians of the Church. It is a fruit of systematic reflection of
scripture. In the New Testament, St. Paul reminded Christians about proper
reverence in receiving the Body of Christ: “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread
or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning
the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself..” (1 Cor 11:27-28).
For Catholics, communion is not
just an act of worship but also an ecclesiological act. Our
reception of communion is ontological – we receive communion because we are in communion. Full communion should
never be regarded as a trivial desire to be together, but rather involves
completeness of "those bonds of communion – faith, sacraments and pastoral
governance – traditionally known as Creed, Cult and Code – as outlined by St
Justin Martyr. For Catholics to participate in such communion without establishing
these bonds would be self-deception and hypocritical. It trivialises the very act of receiving
communion and reduces it to a purely symbolic and instrumental ritual. Likewise, when we formally refuse
to accept the Church’s proper authority to teach, rule and sanctify – her doctrinal
inerrancy, her spiritual jurisdiction and her sacramental power - these rejections separate us from the body
of the Church.
To some people, I am sure, these restrictions
seem harsh and unnecessary, anachronistic to say the least, and a violation of
the ecumenical spirit of our age. The question is, "Why are there so many
restrictions about receiving Holy Communion if people are of goodwill and the
Eucharist is so helpful for us?" “If Protestants allow other Christians to
receive their communion, why can’t we be more hospitable?” These are certainly
legitimate questions, motivated by good intentions. But good intentions are
never sufficient reason to allow open communion. The reasons are more subtle
than that. The first reason, as I have already pointed out, is that the reception
of holy Communion is not just an expression of belief in the Lord Jesus Christ
but also an indication of membership, "communion," in the Church, the
Church where its members visibly share "oneness of faith, life and
worship." Unity among Christians is not yet complete, and the reception of
Holy Communion by other Christians ignores this reality. The second reason is
that the reception of Holy Communion in a Catholic Church presumes Catholic
belief about the Eucharist, in the doctrine of transubstantiation and that the
mass is a veritable sharing in the sacrifice of Calvary, doctrines rejected by
other Christians.
While the motivation for inviting everyone to Holy
Communion might seem to be "ecumenical," in the long run the practice
does more harm than good to authentic ecumenical relationships. The most
detrimental thing is to use the Eucharist as a ‘tool’, a functional means, to
make friends, trivialising its value and relegating it to a superficial coffee
house or mamak stall ‘fellowship.’ It is also detrimental to Christian unity to
just "white wash" our differences with others and sweep it all under
the carpet as if such differences were insignificant. Unity
based on a whitewashing of differences, according to Pope Benedict, is a facade
and only stalls fruitful dialogue. Pretending that there are no differences and
by resting on the lowest common denominator of the faith is to pander to false
and promiscuous union.
Returning to the question of proper
disposition, how do we properly dispose ourselves?
First, you must be in a state of grace. In other
words, you must not be in a state of serious, grave or mortal sin. To receive
the Eucharist without sanctifying grace in your soul profanes the Eucharist in
the most grievous manner. The Didache, an early Christian document
written around A.D. 70, which states: "Whosoever is holy (that is in a
state of sanctifying grace), let him approach. Whosoever is not, let him
repent" (Didache 10).
The requirement of
being in a state of grace leads us to the second point. You must have been to confession since your last
serious sin. The 1983 Code of Canon Law clarifies this point:
"A person who is conscious of a grave sin is not to . . . receive the body
of the Lord without prior sacramental confession unless a grave reason is
present and there is no opportunity of confessing; in this case the person is
to be mindful of the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition, including
the intention of confessing as soon as possible" (CIC 916).
Third, you must believe in the doctrine of
transubstantiation, that is you must believe that what you consume is truly,
really, and substantially to the Body and blood of Christ. According to St
Paul, "For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and
drinks judgment upon himself" (1 Cor. 11:29). A survey was done in the
United States where it was discovered, to my horror, that more than a third of
the American Catholics polled, don’t actually believe in this doctrine. I’m not
sure what a local survey would have revealed. But here again, we are reminded
by St Augustine, “No one should eat this flesh without
first adoring it … we should sin were we not to adore it.”
Fourth, you must observe the Eucharistic fast. Canon
law states, "One who is to receive the most Holy Eucharist is to abstain
from any food or drink, with the exception only of water and medicine, for at
least the period of one hour before Holy Communion" (CIC 919 §1). Note that the law says before Communion, not before the
beginning of Mass. So, one hour isn’t very long. Elderly people, those who are ill are excused
(CIC 191 §3).
The Eucharist, the source and summit of our
Christian life, continues to be a spiritual magnet that draws people to
experience the riches of our Catholic faith. But we must never forget that the issue of communion hinges upon our proper disposition and further
on our Catholic understanding of Church- Eucharistic
communion is inseparably linked to full Ecclesial communion and its visible
expression. We receive communion because we are in communion. Anything less
would be hypocrisy and a lie.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.
Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.