Third Sunday of Easter Year A
The burning question on many people’s mind is “How
do we explain the lack of recognition on the part of the two disciples who were
making their way home to Emmaus?” Many would explain it in a pretty ordinary
and psychological way. You know how an intense
attention to a single object of focus can make a person oblivious to events
around him or her. Many of us know what it means to blank out, when something
troubles us. Grief certainly has this effect. And remember, these disciples
were indeed grieving. They had lost their bearings and sense of spiritual
direction. St Luke notes, “Their eyes were downcast.” When the Lord died, they
lost all hope. Perhaps, so absorbed in their own grief, they failed to
recognise that it was the Lord who was walking beside them. They were also
walking in the wrong direction – away from Jerusalem, away from the tomb, away
from Christ.
Many theories have been advanced to explain their
failure to recognise the Lord. I found
one of the most interesting suggestions being put forward by the renowned
Anglican exegete, William Barclay. He suggests that the two disciples “were
walking towards the sunset. It has been suggested that, that is the very reason
why they did not recognise Jesus. Emmaus was west of Jerusalem. The sun was
sinking, and the setting sun so dazzled them that they did not know their
Lord.” “However that may be,” Barclay adds, “it is true that the Christian is a
man who walks not towards the sunset but towards the sunrise… The Christian
goes onwards, not to a night which falls, but to a dawn which breaks – and that
is what, in their sorry state and their disappointments, the two on the Emmaus
road had not realised.”
You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to
appreciate that the sun rises in the East and sets in the West. The disciples
were walking westward when they should actually be heading East, in the
direction of Jerusalem. The Latin word for the East is “Orient”, a word that
has entered into our English vocabulary and the word ‘orientation’, a
derivative, means direction. The East has been traditionally the direction to
which Christians turn towards at every mass, thus explaining the term, “ad Orientem” or “facing East.” In the early
Church and for centuries thereafter, churches were built in a manner where the
main altar would face eastward. Why would such a “kiblat” or “orientation” be
significant and necessary? The East points to Our Risen Lord and Saviour. When
we say we face the East to pray, we are actually saying that we are facing
Christ, the Morning Star, the Light of the World, the Rising and Unvanquished
Sun.
To quote St. Augustine, “When we rise to pray, we turn East, where
heaven begins. And we do this not because God is there, as if He had moved away
from the other directions on earth..., but rather to help us remember to turn
our mind towards a higher order, that is, to God.” St. Augustine always
refers to this turning to the East in prayer at the end of his homilies, using
a set formula, Conversi ad Dominum (“turn to face the Lord”).
In a liturgical conference in the middle of
last year, this liturgical direction of prayer became a topic of hot debate,
following the call of Cardinal Robert Sarah, the Prefect of the Congregation
for Divine Worship, for priests to begin celebrating mass ad orientem.
There were immediate reactions from several bishops and to assuage the growing
mob of protestors, the Vatican Press Office had to clarify that there has been
no change in liturgical law. Many who were opposed to this suggestion felt that
this would be a betrayal of the reforms of Vatican II. I am not here to make a
case for either position, be it turning to face the people or turning to the
East, as any heated discussion often entails further divisions among the People
of God in the current climate. Both options, eastward
and toward the people, are permitted. One may have a preference and have good
reasons why they hold that preference. However, when both options are permitted
we should not seek to denigrate something that is less optimal to us.
But what I would
like to highlight is a point made by the good Cardinal in his proposal. It is
about our interior orientation or as Pope Emeritus Benedict would point out,
“the absolute priority of God in our worship.” Cardinal Sarah reminded all of
us that the liturgy
is not a celebration of our own achievements but God’s love and mercy. He said:
“We do not come to the Church to celebrate what we have done or who we are.
Rather, we come to celebrate and give thanks for all that Almighty God has
done, and continues in His love and mercy to do, for us.” In other words, the
liturgy cannot be a narcissistic self-absorption of the community or the individual.
The point that would certainly not be disputed by those who disagree with his
proposal is found in this simple but deeply profound statement in the
Cardinal’s speech, “We must ensure that adoration is at the heart of our
liturgical celebrations. The heart of our liturgy is the adoration of God.” It
is not entertainment, it is not a performance, but simply, putting God back in
the centre of our liturgy, it is a movement from “self-centredness to
God-centredness.” When this is forgotten, it is not the liturgy which alone
suffers but the Church too. According to Pope Emeritus Benedict, “the deepest
cause of the crisis that has subverted the Church is located in the effacing of
the priority of God in the liturgy,”
Let us return to the story of the Journey to Emmaus. One can discern
the very elements of the Mass in this passage: Scripture, homily, prayer,
blessing and the breaking of bread, commissioning. Everything in the story
leads us in this direction – the pinnacle of our Christian journey, the climax of
our liturgy and the source of mission is the life-transforming encounter with
the Lord. He is the goal, the heart and centre of our liturgy. At end of their
journey, a journey that takes them from despondency to hope, grief to joy,
self-centredness to God-centredness, the two disciples can finally recognise
the Lord at the breaking of bread. Here, as they face their true East, Christ,
the Risen One, the Sun of Righteousness, they recall how their experience of
travelling with the stranger had rekindled the burning flame of faith in their
hearts that had almost been extinguished by their self-absorbed grief.
The fact that the Lord initially vanishes from the sight of these
two disciples, teaches us that He is no longer seen by the eyes of the flesh,
but by the eyes of faith and the eyes of the heart. So, though He is gone from
our earthly, fleshly, carnal sight, He is now to be seen in the Sacrament of
the Altar, and experienced in the liturgy and other sacraments. And just like
the two disciples who spoke of how the flame of faith within them were
rekindled by the Lord, may our faith too be rekindled at every mass. Let us
always hunger for this act of worship, for we were made to worship God in this
way – right there, front and centre. Let us not be so absorbed with our own
worries, concerns and personal agenda to risk not recognising the Lord in the
Eucharist. We are likely to miss seeing Him when we become
too preoccupied with our dashed hopes and frustrated plans or even our
insatiable need to be entertained.
As we all make this interior turn to the East, to Christ, let us
heed these wise words of Cardinal Sarah given at another interview. “The
liturgy is the door to our union with God. If the Eucharistic celebrations are transformed
into human self-celebrations, the peril is immense, because God disappears. One
must begin by replacing God at the centre of the liturgy. If man is at the
centre, the Church becomes a purely human society, a simple nonprofit organisation, like
Pope Francis has said. If, on the contrary, God is at the heart of the liturgy,
then the Church recovers its vigour and sap!” Conversi ad Dominum – Let
us turn to face the Lord.