Second Sunday of
Lent Year B
Today, the Church
wishes to take us on another journey with Christ but provides us with a radical
change of scenery. From last week’s dreary oppressively harsh conditions of the
desert of Temptation to this week’s stunningly beautiful mountain of the
Transfiguration. I don’t think any one of us can read this unusual account
without his mind being flooded with questions. What is this strange glory that
shown on the face and the garments of Christ on the mountain top? And why did
Moses and Elijah from the Old Testament appear with him on the mountain? And
why did this voice come suddenly from heaven in the brightness of a cloud? And
why was it that Peter and James and John alone of the disciples were chosen to
view this event and why were they there?
Our first question
is: What is this glory that appeared on the face of Christ on the mountain top?
All three of the evangelists Saints Matthew, Mark, and Luke — record this
account, each with minor differences. But all of them agree that Jesus selected
these three disciples and led them apart unto a high mountain. Why were they
there? St Mark in his signature abbreviated style provides no clue but St
Luke tells us that the Lord had gone up the mountain to pray. And as the
disciples were watching him, “there in their presence he was transfigured: his
clothes became dazzlingly white, whiter than any earthly bleachers could make
them.” St Mark’s mention of earthly bleachers emphasises the unusual nature of
this manifestation, a shining forth of supernatural light that could not be
caused by any natural phenomena. They were witnessing the uncreated glory of
His deity shining through His humanity.
But in the gospel
of St Mark, the Transfiguration is certainly meant to point also to the
Parousia, Christ’s return in glory at the end of time. In Chapter 9:1, just
before the Transfiguration, St Mark has our Lord make this prediction, “Truly,
I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they
see the kingdom of God come with power.” St Mark puts the account of the
prediction and the Transfiguration right together and he shows us that the
Transfiguration is a fulfillment of what Jesus said, what he meant when he
said, there are some standing here who will not taste of death before they see
the kingdom of God come with power. And that’s our first clue as to the meaning
of this strange event. For it obviously then is a picture of the coming
kingdom. A little foretaste granted to these three disciples by which they
leaped over the intervening centuries and were, as it were, present at the
coming of Christ in his second return to earth. The transfiguration looks
forward to the hour of His return.
Here’s our next
question: Of all the significant figures in the Hebrew Scriptures, why was it
Moses and Elijah in particular that showed up here with Jesus? Why not Abraham?
Or David? Or some of the other worthies of the Old Testament. Well, Moses was
believed to have single handedly written the Law; Elijah represented all the
Prophets. So, when God’s voice from heaven said about Jesus “Listen to Him!”
that indicated that the Law and the Prophets must now give way to Jesus who
will replace the old way with the new way. He is the completion of the Law and
the fulfillment of the prophecies in the Old Testament. The Law and the
Prophets are swallowed up in him. That all they have to say to mankind, is
included, and added to, in the expression in the life of the Lord Jesus, in the
humanity of Jesus of Nazareth.
Now, one last
question. Why is that Peter and James and John are the disciples chosen to see
this and to learn this lesson? Why them? And the answer very briefly is this.
These are the only three men among the disciples who before this had openly and
vocally avoided the principle of the Cross. Our Lord had foretold many times
that He would have to suffer and die but His disciples never wanted to hear
about it. Peter so belligerently denied that He undergo such suffering
that Jesus had to rebuke him on the spot, identifying his mentality with Satan.
And therefore Peter was included in this group because he’d rejected the Cross.
How about James and John? In Chapter 10, we see how they shamelessly tried to
wrangle out of our Lord, seats of honour on His right and His left. They were
certainly not thinking about the cross but perhaps, thought of the Lord
ascending His throne of glory. Again, our Lord had to introduce a corrective.
The seats of honour are for the Father to assign but every disciple is called
to drink from the cup of the Passion, every disciple must be prepared to take
up his or her cross and follow the Lord on the road that leads to Calvary.
Therefore, these
three men all shared something in common. They all had a skewed idea of glory,
an idea which had no place for the cross. In fact, all three had turned their
backs to the Cross. And as such, they were rejecting the very thing that would
have ensured them eternal glory. All three would have longed for redemption but
failed to see that redemption taking place through the cross. The full
realisation of the redemption of the bodies will be in the resurrection of the
body, not merely in a transfiguration. And there can be no resurrection without
the cross. That was why the Lord brought these three up the mountain. Through
the experience of the transfiguration, Peter, James and John were given a
glimpse of heaven in order to strengthen them for the terrible struggles and
suffering that was yet to come. Peter, James, and John needed the glory of
Tabor before enduring the horror of Golgotha. The Transfiguration of Christ is
preparation for the Cross. His Disciples are in need of this strengthening, in
order to face the Cross of their Teacher, as well as their own crosses.
There’s a mistaken
idea about Christianity today that because Jesus went to the Cross, we’ll never
have to. Nothing could be further from the truth. Each of us has a cross to
carry. As Thomas a' Kempis reminds us, “The cross, therefore, is always
ready; it awaits you everywhere. No matter where you may go, you cannot escape
it, for wherever you go you take yourself with you and shall always find
yourself.” The great spiritual master then adds this wise piece of
advice, “If you carry the cross willingly, it will carry and lead you to the
desired goal where indeed there shall be no more suffering, but here there shall
be. If you carry it unwillingly, you create a burden for yourself and increase
the load, though still you have to bear it. If you cast away one cross, you
will find another and perhaps a heavier one” (The Imitation of Christ, Book II,
chapter 12).
How do we know
this to be true? Well, our Lord has shown us in the example of His own life,
His death and His resurrection. He went to the Cross in order that we might go
with him there. And on through that Cross to the Resurrection beyond. The
transfiguration of Jesus on Mount Tabor tells us that the glory of the
resurrection will only take place through the sufferings of Good Friday. The
transfiguration teaches us that the experience of the cross is necessary in
order for Easter to take place. You can’t have the glory of a Resurrection
morn without the darkness of a crucifixion. And so as we accept the death of
our own plans, our own agendas, our own need to be in control, then beyond lies
the power and the glory of what we can only glimpse as a shadow in the
transfiguration — a restored humanity which we’ll share with him in glory when
He returns in all His splendour, power and glory.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.
Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.