What is the Official position of the Catholic Church
on apparitions?
The Catholic
Church makes a distinction between public and private revelation. In the case of public revelation, the Church
definitely teaches that the entire deposit of faith (all that is necessary for
salvation) is to be found in the twin pillars of revelation, Sacred Scripture
and Sacred Tradition, which comes from the same source, the Word of God, Jesus
Christ. There can be no further revelation that can add to or alter the above.
Any other
‘revelation’ if determined authentic is to be regarded as private. According to St Thomas Aquinas, God
continues to reveal Himself to individuals "not indeed for the declaration
of any new doctrine of faith, but for the direction of human acts" (St.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II q174 a6 reply 3). Private revelation
cannot improve upon, correct or entirely supplant Public Revelation.
Apparitions are to be regarded under the category of private rather than public
revelation.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches:
66 "The Christian economy, therefore, since it is the new and
definitive Covenant, will never pass away; and no new public revelation is to
be expected before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ."
Yet even if Revelation is already complete, it has not been made completely explicit;
it remains for Christian faith gradually to grasp its full significance over
the course of the centuries.
67 Throughout the ages, there have been so-called "private"
revelations, some of which have been recognised by the authority of the Church.
They do not belong, however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to
improve or complete Christ's definitive Revelation, but to help live more fully
by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the Magisterium of the Church,
the sensus fidelium knows how to
discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call
of Christ or his saints to the Church.
How do we determine whether an apparition is
authentic?
On February 25, 1978, the Sacred Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) issued "Norms of the
Congregation for Proceeding in Judging Alleged Apparitions and
Revelations."
According to the
norms, investigation can be done by the following
1. The diocesan bishop on his own initiative or
at the request of the faithful.
2. The national conference of bishops.
3. The Apostolic See (Sacred Congregation for
the Doctrine of the Faith).
The process will
involve 3 steps
1. Initially, to judge the facts according to positive
(moral certainty, qualities of the subject, conformity with doctrines, healthy
devotion) and negative criteria (glaring error as to facts, doctrinal error,
pursuit of monetary gain, gravely immoral acts, psychological disorders) .
2. Then, if this examination appears favourable,
to allow certain public demonstrations of devotion, while continuing to
investigate the facts with extreme prudence (which is equivalent to the
formula: “for the moment, nothing is opposed to it”).
3. Finally, after a certain time, and in the
light of experience, (starting from a particular study of the spiritual fruits
generated by the new devotion), to give a judgment on the authenticity of the
supernatural character, if the case requires this.
What is the status of the alleged image of the Blessed
Virgin Mary which has appeared on a glass panel of the Sime Darby Medical
Centre (formerly Subang Jaya Medical Centre)?
The appearance does not have official approval from the local ordinary, the
Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur, or from the Apostolic See.
The Archbishop
has instructed that the glass panel be respectfully placed in a place conducive
for prayer in the Church of Our Lady of Lourdes, Klang, pending further
investigation to determine its authenticity.
This is not to be
interpreted as a tacit approval or recommendation by the church authorities
that the image is worthy of private or public veneration.
What is the responsibility of the faithful?
The first
responsibility of the faithful is to remain firmly established in the
faith, in the sacraments and in communion with the Pope and bishops. Any
Catholic who gives their primary attention to alleged private revelation at the
expense of Sacred Scripture, the teaching of the Church (especially the Catechism),
sacramental practice, prayer and fidelity to Church authority is off course.
The second
responsibility is to have regard, in the first place, for those private
revelations and apparitions approved by the Church (e.g. Lourdes, Fatima).
Within a balanced practice of the faith the edifying content of approved
private revelations can be a motive for deeper piety and fidelity to the
Gospel.
Finally, there
are many other private revelations that have not received Church approval. The
Second Vatican Council urges us to discern the Spirit in the case of such
extraordinary graces [Lumen gentium 12], which means being neither gullible
or incredulous, but subjecting them to all relevant theological and human tests
of credibility. (Adapted from an online article by Colin B. Donovan, STL)
Thank you. Very informative. We should listen to the advice of Bishop Emeritus Anthony Selvanayagam calling on Catholics not to be over excited about the 'apparition' in Sime Darby Medical Centre. Let the Church do the investigation.
ReplyDeleteGood read for my wife...
ReplyDelete0