Good Friday 2016
For many non-Christians, Good Friday seems to come
across as dark humour in bad taste. It would seem so if you believe that it is
vulgar to put the bodies of the deceased on display in a theatrical manner? Many of you may remember Monty Python’s 1979 irreverent
satirical comedy, the Life of Brian, especially the final scene, where the protagonist,
a guy who lives next door to Jesus, is mistaken as the Messiah and thus
sentenced to a long and painful death. It is at this moment where the audience
is treated to a combination of both the horrifying image of crucifixion, but
with the audio fluffiness of a bunny. His fellow sufferers who have been
crucified on surrounding crosses break into song with the immemorial, “Always
Look on the Bright Side of Life,” an ode to life being a joke and death an even
bigger joke.
A 2014 survey
showed that this was the most popular song at British funerals. Nothing strange
about this because isn’t humour an ancient tool
for subverting tragedy. Parody and satire persuade audiences that even the
greatest of grief can be made comical. Art and literature vicariously teach
audiences to laugh at their own pains and thus grow beyond them.
The Italian
Renaissance poet Dante Alighieri wrote a fanciful account of his own journey
into Hell in three parts known as the Divine Comedy. I have to confess,
I have not read the entirety of the Divine Comedy. I’ve only read bits
and pieces of the bits and pieces. But of the parts that I’ve read, I would be
hard pressed to describe the work as at all humorous. There is no satire, no
parody, no slapstick, no verbally-depicted sight gags. There are no punch
lines. Which leads one to wonder—why did he call it a comedy?
It’s a very good
question, and it actually has a very good answer. Dante’s poetic narrative is
comedy, not because of what it is, but because of what it’s not. It is not a
tragedy. The literary opposite of a comedy is a tragedy. A tragedy revolves
around a main character who is extraordinarily gifted in ability and
circumstance. He or she is of heroic stature, and shows great promise for
accomplishment and leadership. But behind all that potential lies a particular
character flaw—pride, perhaps, or sometimes greed, or maybe lust or envy.
During the course of the story, adversity strikes, and unpredictable events
occur. The potential hero’s character is put to the test, and despite all of
his talents and advantages, the flaw in his character comes to the fore and
proves fatal. The story has an invariably unhappy ending that is sad and
senseless and, with the hindsight of the reader, eminently avoidable. The
tragic hero ends up dead, and all the hope and promise which he represented is
vanished. Whenever tragedy strikes, especially when the lives of
innocents are lost, grief is often supplanted by anger and peoples’ faith are
bound to be shaken. The immediate question that arises in many people’s mind is
this: “Where was God when this happened?”
It is tempting,
then, to describe the Passion narrative, such as we have read today from St
John’s gospel, as a tragedy. It has a highly dramatic plot, a feature which is
intensified by the way we read it during Holy Week. It is a story filled with
injustice, misunderstanding, and human weakness. Political and spiritual forces
combine with random circumstances to railroad an innocent man into a death
which seemed to everyone—friends and enemies alike—to bring a brilliant career
to an abrupt and premature conclusion. If that isn’t tragedy, what is?
But the Passion of
our Lord Jesus Christ according to John—especially according to John, but also
according to Matthew, Mark, and Luke—the Passion of our Lord Jesus Christ is
manifestly not a tragedy. Jesus may be an innocent victim, but he is not a
victim of circumstances. Rather, he is systematically executing God’s
fore-ordained plan for the redemption of the human race and the entire created
order. He tells Pontius Pilate quite plainly: “You say that I am a king. For
this I was born…and for this I have come into the world…” Moreover, Jesus
is also a completely willing victim, a victim at a sacrifice at which he is
also the high priest. Jesus is sovereign, in control. He is not handed over to
death passively, but actively; he hands himself over to death. Jesus’
crucifixion is not the tragic result of a fatal character flaw, but, rather,
the most purely virtuous act that can be imagined. “Greater love has no man,
than that he should lay down his life for his friends.”
Finally, even
though Jesus has emptied himself and taken the form of a servant and become
obedient unto death on the cross, he is not ultimately conformed to the shape
and the demands of his suffering and death. He enters the jaws of death and it
is death that is changed, not Jesus. In his utter humiliation, Christ has won
for us honour and glory. In his total alienation, he has brought about our
reconciliation with the Father. And finally, in his death, he won for us the
gift of eternal life. We will soon move from the Liturgy of the Word to the
Rite of Veneration of the Cross. We do so not because we are immortalising the
symbol of tragedy. We do so because are affirming the power of what took place
on the cross. The cross did not transform Christ, but, rather, Christ
transformed the cross. An instrument of shameful death is made to be the way of
life and peace. The tree of death has become the tree of life.
But if there is a
part of the Passion Narrative that ends in tragedy, it would have to be the
ending written for Jesus’ betrayer, Judas Iscariot. The story provides us with
a stark contrast between the two Apostles, St Peter, the Lord’s denier, and
Judas Iscariot, the Lord’s betrayer, and the consequences of their greatest
moment of weakness. It is as if the liturgy invites us to choose – do we follow
Judas or Peter? Peter had remorse for
what he did, but Judas was also remorseful to the point of crying out, “I have
betrayed innocent blood!” and he gave back the thirty pieces of silver. Where
is the difference then? Only in one thing: Peter had confidence in the mercy of
Christ, and Judas did not! Judas’ greatest sin was not in having betrayed
Christ but in having doubted his mercy. Here is what the story of our brother
Judas should move us to do: to surrender ourselves to the one who freely
forgives, to throw ourselves likewise into the outstretched arms of the
Crucified One who reveals to us the Merciful face of the Father.
Like Dante’s poem,
jokes, satirical movies can and have been made about the Passion of our Lord
Jesus Christ, but, also like Dante’s work, it is not a funny story. Like
Dante’s poem, the story of the Passion is dramatically absorbing, but neither
one is amusing or entertaining. There is no denying that pain, suffering, and
death are real. But the good news proclaimed by the events which we commemorate
today is this – they need not end in tragedy and there is no need for us to reinforce
a sense of false optimism by singing “Always Look on the Bright Side of Life.” Like Dante’s poem, our Lord’s Passion is so
much the opposite of a tragedy, that it can only be known as a Divine Comedy. The
comedy of Good Friday displays a universe where order ultimately triumphs over
chaos, good over evil and where God always has the last word; and that word is
life, that word is love, that word is hope. The cross is not tragedy. The cross
is life, the cross is love, the cross is hope, our only hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.
Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.