Seventeenth Sunday
in Ordinary Time Year B
We just
concluded our parish feast of Corpus Christi at the beginning of last month but
we can never have enough of the (“topic of the”) Eucharist. We are indeed
blessed to know that the liturgy treats us this Sunday with a prefiguration of
the Eucharist in the miracle of the multiplication and on the next four Sundays
of August, we will hear the great discourse of our Lord in the synagogue of
Capernaum in which He reveals Himself as the Bread of Life.
But before
we consider the familiar story in the gospel, let us take a look at the first
reading which is taken from the Old Testament. The great doctor of the West, St
Augustine taught that the New Testament is hidden in the Old and the Old is
made manifest in the New. We see this in the two narratives found both in the
First Reading and the Gospel. Our Lord was not the first to miraculously
multiply loaves. The prophet Elisha worked a similar miracle. The first reading
describes a hungry crowd, someone bringing forth barley loaves, and another
objecting that the bread is too little for the large crowd. In both accounts,
all the people were able to eat their fill; there was a multiplication of the
loaves and there was bread left over. Of course the juxtaposition of these two
parallels is meant to highlight that our Lord’s miracle is superior to that of
Elisha’s. While Elisha had 10 barley loaves, our Lord only had 5 loaves and 2
fish to work with. The crowd in the first reading was only about 100 whereas
the multitude in the gospel story would have exceeded five thousand, not
counting the women and children. In the first reading, there was just a
perfunctory footnote that “they ate and had some (left) over,” whereas the left
over from Jesus’ miracle filled twelve baskets.
In the
Gospel miracle, Scripture scholars have identified another level of meaning in
the multiplication of the loaves and fish: a Eucharistic meaning. The early
Christians definitely recognised the connexion between the multiplication of
the loaves and the Eucharist. In second-century catacombs, we find artistic
representations of the miracle of the multiplication of the loaves to symbolise
the Eucharist. Already in the four Gospel accounts of this miracle, we see a
strong Eucharistic motif. We find the same verbs used describing Jesus’ action
at the miracle, as are used in the account of the institution of the Eucharist
at the Last Supper: He “took the loaves (bread), gave thanks, and gave them out
(distributed).” The verb in Greek for giving thanks, “eucharistein”,
became the word the Christians used for the sacrament: Eucharist. When the
people had their fill, Jesus told the disciples to gather the fragments that
were left over so that nothing would be wasted. There was also in the early Church,
great care taken with the Eucharistic fragments that were left over. Unlike
many Protestant churches, the consecrated host left over from Holy Communion is
never just simply discarded as if they no longer have any significance. They
are carefully and reverentially conserved and reposed in the tabernacle of the
Church, because they continue to be truly, really and substantially, the Body
and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ.
Today, I would also like to draw your attention to a
little point made in both multiplication narratives. Both Elisha and our Lord
worked with material offered by someone, an anonymous man hailing from
Baal-Shalishah in the first instance and an anonymous boy in the second. Their
anonymity may be a clue pointing to the fact that they are representative of
any person willing to make a small humble offering to the Lord. In other words,
both Elisha and Jesus did not just conjure the original substance of their
miracle from thin air. This should also draw our attention to something said in
the course of our celebration of the Eucharist. During the part of the
Preparation of the Gifts which begins the Liturgy of the Eucharist (popularly
and inaccurately known as the Offertory), the priest takes the bread and
recites these words (quietly if an Offertory Hymn is being sung), “Blessed are
you, Lord God of all creation, for through your goodness we have received the
bread we offer you: fruit of the earth and work of human hands, it will become
for us the bread of life” and similar words are used when he raises the
chalice.
We are
reminded through these words that these gifts of bread and wine which we offer
are first and foremost gifts in themselves which we have received through God’s
goodness. But both bread and wine are
also “the work of human hands” always remembering that we would have nothing to
offer apart from His goodness. Now, in expectation, we speak of what this bread
and wine will become: the bread of life and our spiritual drink. God will take
this thing that we offer and will change it yet again, this time into
something that we could never make it: the body and blood of Christ. This
prayer reminds us that we are collaborators with God in His work of creation,
but more so in His work of redemption.
He has given us this world and filled us with the grace to care for it
and develop it, turning potentials into beautiful realities as we turn grain
into bread and grapes into wine. But both these things remain perishables. However, there is one way in which the fruit
of our labours can be eternal; we can offer them to God. They will remain
perishable, unless God takes the work of human hands and once again makes it
something better, imperishable food. Our efforts can only be brought to
perfection, to heavenly fulfilment, if we place them back in the hands of God.
Pope
Emeritus Benedict XVI, in Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation (which for all
purposes seems to have been forgotten), “Sacramentum caritatis,” speaks about
the presentation and offering of the gifts in number 47: “This humble and
simple gesture is actually very significant: in the bread and wine that we
bring to the altar, all creation is taken up by Christ the Redeemer to be
transformed and presented to the Father. In this way we also bring to the altar
all the pain and suffering of the world, in the certainty that everything has
value in God's eyes. The authentic meaning of this gesture can be clearly
expressed without the need for undue emphasis or complexity. It enables us to
appreciate how God invites man to participate in bringing to fulfilment His
handiwork, and in so doing, gives human labour its authentic meaning, since,
through the celebration of the Eucharist, it is united to the redemptive sacrifice
of Christ.”
The miracles
of Elijah, indisputably the greatest prophet of the Old Testament, were
surpassed by his protégé, Elisha, and the miracles of Elisha were surpassed by
the one who is greater than all the prophets of old and in fact the fulfilment
of all prophecies, Our Lord Jesus Christ. And yet none of them (not even our
Lord’s miracle of multiplication) can compare with the miracle of our Lord
dying on the altar of the Cross in atonement for the sins of mankind, and the
gift of everlasting life that the miracle of His Resurrection promises to
everyone who accepts Him as Saviour and Lord. This is the great ‘miracle’ that
we witness daily, and every Sunday during the celebration of the Holy Sacrifice
of the Mass, the Eucharist, which re-“presents” that great atoning sacrifice of
the Cross. Yes, what you are about to witness here at the unbloody altar of the
Holy Mass is a far greater miracle than the miracles of multiplication
performed by Elisha and Jesus when they fed the multitude. Let us therefore
offer our humble gifts of bread and wine, “fruit(s) of our hands” knowing that
it will become for us “the bread of life” and our “spiritual drink.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.
Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.