Twenty Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time Year B
Who was this itinerant exorcist in today’s passage? We have little information about him apart from what is said about him in John’s complaint: this man is “not one of us,” which means he is not part of the Lord’s band of disciples, or at least, a part of His inner circle, the Twelve. But John at least admits that this man is driving out demons in the Lord’s name.
Apparently, John’s criterion for
legitimate ministry is acting under the disciples’ authority, they are the
gatekeepers, instead of the Lord. He fails to recognise that their authority
and power and that of this perceived “rival” comes from the Lord, who is the
source and the foundation of their authority and power. His protest echoes the
objection of Joshua in the first reading, who grumbled to Moses that Eldad and
Medad were not part of the group to whom Moses imparted his spirit, yet they
too received the gift of prophecy.
Although the disciples found fault with
this man casting out demons in the Lord’s name because he wasn’t a part of
their elite group, our Lord saw nothing wrong with his actions. In fact, our
Lord reprimands them and orders them to not stop this man in his ministry: “You
must not stop him: no one who works a miracle in my name is likely to speak
evil of me.” He is directing His disciples to take an expansive, rather than a
restrictive approach toward others who are acting in His name. And the reason
is because “anyone who is not against us is for us.” The criterion for acceptance
of the ministry of this person is that it is not in opposition to the Lord’s
ministry and that of His disciples. But the converse is also true: “whoever is
not with me is against me” (Matthew 12:30). In the end, there is no neutral
ground in relation to Christ: sooner or later everyone (whether consciously or
unconsciously) chooses either to be on His side or to oppose Him.
Some people, including Catholics, take our
Lord’s words as justification for religious indifferentism. Religious
indifferentism is the heretical belief that all religions have equal value and
are equal paths to salvation. This popular notion is so ingrained in our psyche
that anyone who makes counter claims concerning the uniqueness of the Catholic
Faith or that Jesus is the sole and universal saviour of mankind, would be
deemed heretical. In fact, this pernicious belief is quite likely the most
widespread heresy of our present age. Though many would never admit that they
are proponents of a heresy, we see it hidden in so many common sayings: “You
have your beliefs and I have mine;” “It doesn’t matter which religion you
belong to. It’s all the same.” So, was our Lord’s words to His disciples in
support of this way of thinking?
The key phrase to understand the context
of our Lord’s words is “in my Name” or “in Jesus’ name.” This man was not doing
it by his own authority. He was not claiming that his ability to exorcise and
heal, came from his own resources or from some other deity. His actions pointed
back to the Lord. If demons are cast out and people are healed, it is the Lord
Jesus’ doing, not his. Our Lord’s words are not meant to give a stamp of
approval to religious indifferentism. In fact, it is the very antithesis of
religious indifferentism. That if anyone is saved, he or she is saved by Jesus
and Jesus alone, no one else can take credit for it. To do something in the
Lord’s name is to acknowledge the bankruptcy of our own resources and the
adequacy of His grace.
Our Lord had just taught His followers
that the criteria needed to become His disciple calls for self-renunciation and
sacrifice. They are to reject worldly glory, resist the temptation of making a
name for themselves because ultimately, what a disciple does, he does it “in
the name” of the Lord. The fact that they felt envious and threatened by this
perceived rival to their privileged authority, reveals their true motives. They
were selfishly possessive of God’s grace, and rather than rejoicing that others
had a share in it, they felt jealous and saw them as rivals. The disciples were
doing good works for self-glory. They were doing it to make a name for
themselves. Rather than acting in our Lord’s name, they were acting in their
own.
Our Lord continues teaching them by
saying: “If anyone gives you a cup of water to drink just because you belong to
Christ, then I tell you solemnly, he will most certainly not lose his reward.”
In a way, this serves as a parallel to last week’s last verse, which spoke of
hospitality shown to a child is equivalent to hospitality shown to Christ and
the One who sent Christ. In both sayings, what is highlighted is the generosity
of God toward all and the great value of simple, humble acts of service and
hospitality, regardless of whether such acts are done by persons inside or
outside the Church. Note once again, that what is being promoted is not
religious indifferentism but that all acts of kindness towards a disciple
because of his association with Christ, will be rewarded.
The last part of today’s passage, provides
a balanced perspective to our Christian vision of discipleship. If the first
part of today’s passage accentuated the need for broad mindedness and
inclusiveness regarding the good deeds of others, this last part reminds us
that sin should never be tolerated. Goodness and kindness by others can and
should always be celebrated, but sin is never to be encouraged. If God can
reward someone for his or her good deeds, He will not hesitate to punish
someone for their evil deeds. So, our Lord uses a series of hyperbolic
analogies, from drowning to bodily mutilation, to emphasis the gravity of sin.
These examples may appear barbaric by modern standards, but they are used
precisely to illustrate God’s complete abhorrence of sin, whether it be
directed to another or to oneself.
The opening and the concluding section of
today’s passage reveals to us the nature of God - He is both merciful and just
– one does not exclude the other. There is no contradiction. God welcomes and
rewards acts of goodness wherever He finds it, and not just among those who
claim to know Him or act in His name. As goodness can never be a companion to
evil, so too God will not tolerate evil and sin within us. These have deep
implications in our own spiritual lives - we too must welcome and celebrate the
goodness done by others if in the end it is done for the sake of God who will
see to their reward, but we must be constantly on guard against the scandal of
evil and sin, and be prepared to take all necessary steps to remove them
through sincere repentance, or be prepared to “be thrown into hell where their
worm does not die nor their fire go out”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.
Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.