Eleventh Sunday in
Ordinary Time Year C
I’m going to make
an unusual departure from the gospel story as the starting point for today’s
homily. The gospel may be the preferred choice for most homilists, this being
the Year of Mercy. My starting point, however, begins in the first reading. It
is the tail end of a sordid tale of adultery compounded with murder. The main story-line
deserves an R rating and I won’t be surprised that some of you may choose to walk
out as it would seem an unfit story to be told in the presence of children. So,
parental guidance is strongly recommended.
The premise of the
prophet Nathan’s confrontation of King David began with the latter, seeing from
his balcony the lovely Bathsheba at her bath, lusting for her, having her brought
to his palace and lying with her and then arranging for the untimely demise of
her husband Uriah, a loyal soldier in his army. Now had Bathsheba not become
with child, David could have most likely covered up his malfeasance. But
Bathsheba did become pregnant, and David turned to scheming which eventually
led to the death of Uriah. And all might have ended there for David, were it
not for the insertion of a simple footnote in the text, “But the thing that
David had done displeased the Lord.”
So the Lord sent
the prophet Nathan to David. Many of you may have heard part one of this
encounter in your earlier days, the parable about two men, one rich, the other
poor, and how the rich man had taken a lamb, the sole possession of the poor
man for his own purposes. Hearing the story, David exploded in
anger. “The man who did this ought to be lynched!”
Here the greatest
king in the history of Israel, a proverbial success story of a simple shepherd
boy who became king, is tarred by this indelible black mark on his otherwise
seemingly pristine record. Not just a simple petty crime. but two of the worst
sins imaginable – adultery and murder. What seems worse was David’s lack of
repentance or ownership of his crime. There was no indication that he had
regretted his actions or even felt the slightest guilt for this heinous crime.
Perhaps, David was seduced by his own self-importance. Perhaps, he believed he
did not have to answer to anyone as he is king. But the Lord sent Nathan to hold
him accountable.
One would expect a
protest or at least a lengthy defense. But David makes a simple confession, “I
have sinned against the Lord.” No excuses, no quibbling, no finger pointing, no
scapegoating, no public display for sympathy. God accepted David’s remorse and
forgave him, but the costs of David’s action could not be undone. David
would pay a painful price in troubles that would come to his family, largely
because of forces his sin had put into motion.
God did not remain
aloof or silent in face of the sin and great injustice committed by David. It
would not have been mercy, if He had chosen to do so. God, however, sent Nathan
to David to talk about what David had done, to say that it was not “OK”, to
convict David of his sin. Admonishing and correcting the sinner is never an
expression of judgmentalism but rather a neessary spiritual work of mercy. But
the amazing thing is the story does not end there. Our lives are formed,
accountable and answerable to a gracious and merciful Father. But we are not
only the accountable and responsible. We are also the forgiven. Our sin,
serious and consequential as it is, does not defeat us. We can confess the
truth of our sin; we can receive forgiveness; we can start over, begin again.
How? Through God’s forgiving grace. This is the amazingly good news which
we have to announce to the world today.
The story of David
and Nathan in the first reading therefore sets the stage for our gospel account
of the woman with the bad name washing the feet of Jesus with her own tears.
There is no denying that the story is about Jesus’ immense mercy. But it is
also the story of the woman’s visible repentance. There is another story that
seems to be a parallel parable of mercy. It is the woman caught in adultery.
There is, however, a distinction between the two stories. In the case of the
woman caught in adultery, there is no indication that she felt remorse and had
come before Jesus to ask for pardon. Most likely this had not taken place. It
was just unfortunate that her sin had been found out and now she was forced to
shamefully face the charges that had been laid against her. Sounds like a
description of the Malaysian context, “there is no law until you’re caught.”
The woman in
today’s gospel, however, has an entirely different disposition. She is aware
that others know of her reputation. She willingly submits to the crowds’ derision
and to Jesus’ host mocking stares and even judgment. She comes with true
contrition in her heart. Contrition is proven by her tears. It is as if St
Basil, the father of Eastern monasticism, once wrote, “Weep over your sin: it
is a spiritual ailment; it is death to your immortal soul; it deserves
ceaseless, unending weeping and crying; let all tears flow for it, and sighing
come forth without ceasing from the depths of your heart.” Those tears were an
outward sign of her inner repentance that unlocked the flood gates of mercy. Notice
the irony, the woman washed Jesus’ feet with her tears and He washed her soul
with his redeeming grace and mercy. She offers Him her love, because through
the gift of forgiveness, she now comes to realise how much she has been loved
by the Lord.
Jesus fully
understands the reason for this woman’s love for him. He provides us with the
litmus test. It is those who have been forgiven much that are capable of loving
much. Simon the Pharisee saw no need for forgiveness, thus his love remains
small and miserly. Forgiven little, love little. David acknowledged his own guilt before God and experience an outpouring
of mercy and forgiveness. This must have certainly made him a better king, not
a perfect one though, but a better king nonetheless. We love God in proportion
to how much we understand we have been forgiven. Forgiveness expands our ability to love. It’s
a cause-and-effect thing: His forgiveness is the cause; our love is the effect.
It may indeed to be shameful to acknowledge that we are a sinner, in fact we
may be a big sinner. But the good news is that we have a bigger Saviour.
In just a few
moments God will reassure us of His love and of that forgiveness in a very real
and personal way as he comes to us in the bread and wine of the Lord’s
Supper. Healing and forgiveness are intertwined with this banquet which
the Lord prepares for us. The sick is healed, the sinner is forgiven, and
incredibly the outsider is ‘invited’ not only to the table but also to enter
into communion with Christ and His Church. The most undeserving of people are
given a place at the table – to be heard, healed, forgiven, restored, taught,
fed and to become beneficiaries of divine hospitality. There is only one
criteria needed – we are sinners in need of forgiveness, in need of healing and
in need of salvation. Those who think they are well, who think they have no
need for forgiveness, have no place at the table. But those who come with the
heavy baggage of sin, we have come so that our burdens may be lifted, our guilt
removed, our sins forgiven, and to receive a new life in Christ, the One who
forgive sins and restores us to our rightful place with God.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.
Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.